Do FDA-Compliant Gloves Ensure Food Safety?

Contamination Is Closer Than You Think
A UK investigation revealed that hands can carry a wide variety of gut and faecal material. Traces of faeces were found on every McDonald’s touchscreen swabbed. Specific findings from one branch included:
-
Staphylococcus spp.: can cause blood poisoning and toxic shock syndrome
-
Listeria: can cause listeriosis, potentially leading to miscarriage or stillbirth in pregnant women
- Proteus: present in human and animal faeces, can cause urinary tract infections
Similarly, a USDA study found that consumers fail to wash their hands properly 97% of the time. Rushed or ineffective handwashing can lead to cross-contamination of food and surfaces, increasing the risk of foodborne illness.
Even with signage and training in food establishments, these studies suggest hand hygiene alone may not be sufficient. Gloves are intended to act as an additional protective barrier, but only if they are used correctly.
Why Gloves Alone Aren’t Enough

The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code states that food handlers should avoid bare-hand contact with ready-to-eat foods and instead use utensils such as single-use gloves. However, the Code also notes:
- Gloves can become a source of cross-contamination if misused
- Proper handwashing before gloving is essential
- Glove storage and handling directly affect food safety
In practice, the combination of poor hand hygiene, glove punctures, and improper storage can create a “perfect storm” for contamination.
Human Skin Microbes and Glove Juice
The human hand is home to up to 10 million microorganisms from around 1,000 species (Grice et al. 2009), (Price 1938). Most are harmless, but some, like Staphylococcus or Streptococcus, can cause disease.
Problems arise when transient organisms colonise hands or combine with glove punctures (Price 1938; Michaels et al. 2004). This can create a liquid bridge, a direct path for microbes to transfer to food or surfaces (Cole & Bernard 1964; Fox 1971).
What is Glove Juice?
Hands contain over 400 sweat glands per square centimetre. When wearing disposable gloves, moisture becomes trapped, oxygen levels drop, and skin maceration accelerates microbial growth. The nail region, difficult to clean thoroughly, has the richest microbial flora. This warm, damp environment, often called “glove juice,” amplifies contamination risks.
Even with gloves, the FDA emphasises handwashing before donning gloves, because gloves can transfer microbes if hands are not properly cleaned.
The Food Safety Gap
Many believe FDA (21 CFR 177) compliant gloves automatically ensure food safety. In reality:
-
FDA food handling compliance does not require testing for pinhole defects (AQL – Acceptable Quality Level).
-
Studies show up to 50% of vinyl gloves contain holes, with 96% of punctures going undetected by wearers.
- Up to 18,000 Staphylococci can pass through a single glove hole in just 20 minutes, even after 10 minutes of hand scrubbing (Guzewich & Ross, 1999).
The FDA Food Code categorises gloves as “utensils,” meaning they must meet standards for:
- Construction and material
- Cleanliness and repair
- Storage and handling
Where gloves are stored and what surfaces they contact directly affect food safety. Inferior gloves increase the risk of pathogen transfer to food.

Understanding Glove Standards
FDA Title 21 CFR Part 177 (CFR) (Glove Composition)
Food contact gloves must be made from substances recognised as safe for food contact. However:
-
Compliance is based on letters of guarantee, not batch-specific testing.
- Manufacturers can alter raw materials or hygiene practices to cut costs while remaining technically compliant. The opportunity also exists for deliberate or accidental contamination within the process.
FDA Title 21 CFR Part 110 (Good Manufacturing Practice)
Key requirements include:
-
Gloves must be intact, clean, and sanitary
-
Must be made of impermeable material
-
Single-use gloves must be used for one task only.
- Gloves must be discarded if damaged, soiled, or contaminated
However, various studies have shown:
-
Vinyl gloves fail 12–61% of the time under normal use (A Rego, 1999).
-
Exposure to chemicals (like 70% ethanol) can increase failure rates to up to 94% (R. C. Klein, 1990).
-
Environmental bacteria were found on over 80% of disposable gloves in some studies (Hughes A Kim, 2013).
This highlights the importance of glove origin, material quality, and proper usage.

Why Gloves Fail & How Contamination Occurs
Major risk factors include:
-
Poor hand hygiene: CDC study show food industry workers wash hands properly for only 27% of the recommended time
-
Incorrect donning/doffing: Gloves must be put on and removed correctly
-
Cheap glove materials: Vinyl and polyethylene gloves are permeable to bacteria and viruses
-
Punctures or tears: Up to 50–90% go unnoticed, directly related to glove quality
Six Ways to Mitigate the Risks of Inferior Gloves
1. Purchase Quality Gloves from a Reputable Supplier
The quality of a disposable glove depends on raw materials, manufacturing, and quality procedures. Cheaper imports may have hidden defects. Eagle Protect tests gloves rigorously to reduce physical, chemical, and microbiological risks.

2. Know the AQL of Your Gloves
The Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) measures pinhole defects. For example, an AQL of 1.5 allows 15 failures per 1,000 gloves. Glove manufacturers test a random sample of gloves from a batch during initial production and test for subsequent pin-hole defects.
This image to the right shows AQL testing for pinholes. Currently, there is no AQL requirement for food service gloves, making it crucial to select gloves with known and tested standards. All Eagle Protect gloves meet or exceed medical examination grade standards.
3. Use Medical Examination Grade Gloves
These gloves:
-
Are FDA 510(k) cleared for medical use.
-
Undergo puncture, abrasion, tension, elongation, and chemical resistance tests.
-
Have a low AQL (≤2.5), providing a higher-quality barrier against pathogens.
4. Select the Correct Material and Thickness
-
Avoid vinyl: prone to holes, permeability, and chemical contamination. Vinyl gloves have been described by some as “infection control nightmares” (Michaels, B. & T. Ayers), and are recommended to be worn for short periods only, and for intermittent or non-food contact areas.
-
Use nitrile: impermeable, durable, and safe for extended food handling. Latex gloves are no longer used to handle food in New Zealand since some people are allergic to proteins in the latex.
-
Thickness matters less than raw material quality: thicker gloves from cheap materials may restrict mobility and increase fatigue.
5. Include Gloves in Food Safety Programs
15–18% of foodborne illness outbreaks involve glove cross-contamination (CDC et al). Incorporating proper glove selection, usage, and monitoring is essential. Eagle Protect offers on-site audits to optimise glove practices or check out our Glove Best Practice guidelines.
6. Conduct Ongoing Research
Continuous studies, including work by food safety expert Barry Michaels, evaluate the hazards of disposable gloves and help develop better protocols. Cutting costs on gloves is a false economy that can compromise both safety and business.
Choosing a Provider Whose Gloves Are Proven Safe
Eagle Protect’s multi-stage Delta Zero™ testing program ensures food contact gloves remain safe in RTE settings, with no pathogen transfer.
With 15–18% of outbreaks implicating gloves, selecting and correctly using the right glove is critical. Inferior gloves can financially and reputationally cripple a business.
We supply only certified food-safe gloves with a transparent supply chain, aiming to build a trusting partnership with our customers. Contact us to discuss enhancing your food safety programs or to experience the quality difference firsthand.
